Description

An archive of the blog posts at indiainlondon.com which is no longer maintained. We hope you enjoy delving back into some of our past musings and thoughts.

Saturday, 19 April 2014

Forever India - the Commonwealth War Graves Commission

[caption id="attachment_1254" align="alignleft" width="300"]Khadki war cemetery, Pune, India Khadki war cemetery, Pune, India[/caption]

Just today I came across the Forever India pages of the Commonwealth War Graves Commission website and it appears to be the only separate country to be awarded this distinction - although that may be because other countries (Canada, New Zealand, Australia, and South Africa) make greater efforts in commemorating their fallen servicemen.  These other countries, however,  became independent much earlier than India and modern India and other countries such as Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Burma may seek to minimise their contribution to the defence of the Empire.  The pages are a great resource to anyone interested in the Indian contributions.

This India section puts in context the great commitment and sacrifice of Indians in both World Wars in a variety of theatres.  Some of the stories of heroism exemplified by holders of the Victoria Cross are very poignant and moving, as are excerpts of letters home.

The short video on the main page focuses mainly on the work of the CWGC,  its cemeteries,  short insights into the lives of Indian soldiers in WW1, the Chattri Memorial, about which we wrote a short blog and the Commonwealth Memorial Gate on Constitution Hill, again the subject of a blog.  In another blog, a review of a lecture on Indian soldiers in World War 1, we offer some insights into the issues in managing soldiers of different religions. In this centenary year of the beginning of the World War 1 it is more important than ever that we remember the sacrifices of all servicemen.

In an article by Fergal Keane on the Basra Memorial, in modern day Iraq, where the deaths of 1,771 Indian soldiers are commemorated,  he concludes with a quote from Plato: “only the dead have seen the end of war”.(http://nlwmemorial.tripod.com/nlwmemorial/pages/pagesmisc/basramemorialfergalkeane.htm)

 

http://www.cwgc.org/foreverindia/

http://www.indiainlondon.com/the-indian-army-in-world-war-1-national-army-museum/

http://www.indiainlondon.com/there-is-a-corner-of-a-foreign-field-that-is-forever-india-the-chattri-memorial-service-9-june-2013/ - the Chattri Memorial

http://www.indiainlondon.com/commonwealth-memorial-gates/

Thursday, 3 April 2014

“Days and Nights in Calcutta” – My Guide to being Bengali

Being brought up mainly in Birmingham in the 1970s I had very limited exposure to Indian and Bengali culture despite the English Midlands being a centre of immigrant communities.  I had spent a few months in India when I was about 5 and then didn’t visit again till I was 19; relatives were always seen through the prism of old photographs and I had little or no experience of meeting them.  I was always aware of the fact that we were Bengali but it wasn’t until I spent one summer working in a pharmacy with people coming up to me and speaking unknown languages – Hindi and Punjabi probably -  that I realised how different we were.

My mother always wore a sari which I’ve now learnt is quite unusual – most of my Birmingham aunts wore Western clothes sometimes.  There were numerous air mail letters from India each week – thankfully my father and my uncle wrote in English which meant I could at least read my uncle’s letters – and my father received an international edition of The Statesman – printed on very thin paper to minimise air mail charges - the Calcutta newspaper, each month.  I don’t think I had been to an Indian / Bengali event in the UK till I was about 10 or 11 and when we did go no one explained to us the symbolism or rituals so we felt rather left out.  The Durga Pujas, the Bengali equivalent of Christmas, were more of a social event for my parents.  Probably at about the age of 12 I stopped going to Bengali events.

I still have vague memories of our extended visit to Calcutta when I was 5 years old.  I remember my grandfather’s house mainly because of all the personalities there from my grandfather to my uncles and aunts and 3 girl cousins. There is one wonderful photo of me dressed as a geisha – don’t ask why, I don’t know – with a cousin dressed as a Native Indian.  Perhaps we were off to a fancy dress party.  I think I would have been in my element with so many trusted relatives around me.

The house, in what had previously been an upmarket part of Calcutta, had apparently been bought from an Englishman and extended with a small pedestrian bridge connecting two separate buildings.  Generally the ground floors of buildings were vacant, or let out to tenants, possibly because there was always in Calcutta the fear of monsoon floods.  I don’t know exactly when but I believe my grandfather bought the house in the 1920s before my mother was born.  My mother remembers a telephone in the house from a young age.  Milk was apparently bought from a farmer who brought his cow to the front door so the household could watch the cow being milked.

During the short time in Calcutta I went to two reputed schools: Calcutta Boys School and Don Bosco, both of course English medium.  In the intervening period we had spent a few months in Assam, in Gauhati the capital, in the middle of monsoon and I remember our bungalow being on stilts and the monsoon rains.  The flight to Gauhati must have been my first flight as we had come to Calcutta by boat and train.  Thankfully my father’s quest to find a role befitting his hard won surgical skills and qualifications failed to bear fruit and after exactly a year in India we returned to the West, and the west of Ireland where I must have picked up an Irish accent.

Sadly there were no visits to India again till I was 19, and I think the intervening years were the time to instil Indian values and culture.  I think because I was denied them I go looking for that culture nowadays.  We were royally treated on that trip; my uncle was a very senior policeman and access to hard currency bought us high status in India. I remember being met at Dum Dum Airport by perhaps 40 or 50 relatives who I didn’t know nor was I introduced to.

That trip, despite also touring the sights of Delhi and beyond, was the most shocking.  Calcutta was in the midst of its genteel decline almost at its nadir.  The poverty was almost literally in your face; old women, maimed children would come up to your car and beg.  There were frequent power cuts, quaintly called “load shedding” and houses had their own generators or one was left with just candlelight.  The educated left, for other parts of India and the West.  If you were influential and connected life was good.

In retrospect I was probably arrogant and if any cousins read this I apologise.  We were Westerners visiting a Third World nation and, of course we were young and superior.  But in my defence I had no exposure to the breadth and depth, and the wonder that is India.  I would be looking upon the country in a very simplistic way: the poverty, the limited and inadequate infrastructure, the lack of consumer goods.  Cousins asked us to bring Walkmans and Levi jeans.  I should have given thanks for being born an Englishman but not felt superior about it.  There was one incident that I think summed things up: we took photos with our Polaroid camera, which deliver instant photos, and there was widespread astonishment.

At Bagdogra Airport, the gateway to Darjeeling, my father bumped into his niece, my cousin, who was married to the manager of a tea plantation.  Her son was quickly introduced to his great uncle, my father, but for some reason we were not introduced to my cousin.

Returning to the UK I must have found that my interest in India was unsated.  In terms of my need to connect with my "Bengaliness" the trip was superficial.  There was in those days very little to connect me to India in the UK; there was little interest in the press, I would not have been interested in Indian politics, we didn’t see Bollywood and there were few books.  Ironically on a coach tour around Europe a couple of years later, while I was accompanying my policeman uncle, an American woman recommended The Far Pavilions and was rather surprised I hadn’t read it.  So on my return to Birmingham I bought a copy.

Like most of the available literature on India The Far Pavilions was written from a British perspective.  MM Kaye was Indian born and wrote what might best be described as a romantic adventure.  I would probably have stalked Dillons in central Birmingham, probably then the best book shop in the Midlands, for India related books.  I would have bought Lives of the Indian Princes, a coffee table book, EM Forster’s Passage to India – I was a sucker for anything with India in the title – and Paul Scott’s The Jewel in the Crown, which was a TV drama series.

Then one day I found Days and Nights in Calcutta in Dillons and to some extent I had secured my connection to India; thus ended my initial search for my Bengali roots.  It might be rather grandiose to ascribe such attributes to a mere book but I can assure you it furthered my understanding of what it was to be Bengali.  It was in many respects a revelation.

Days and Nights in Calcutta was already dated when I first read it but nevertheless compelling.  It is written by two married North American based academics and writers Bharati Mukherjee, of Bengali origin, and her husband Clark Blaise, a Canadian. They had met in the 1960s at a writers’ workshop in the USA and forged a life together.  During the 1970s they had decided to spend a year in India with their young boys and the book is largely an exploration of their time in India.  The book is divided into two parts, the first written by Blaise and the second by Mukherjee.

I was always drawn more to Blaise’s chapters because like him I view Calcutta and Bengalis almost as an outsider. Blaise talks about learning to speak Bengali fast and eating Bengali food with his fingers neither of which I can do. When arriving in Calcutta without his wife he steels himself to “pronam” his wife’s uncles i.e. touch their feet in respect, but finds he cannot do it.  Blaise excuses himself by admitting the gesture is not his culture.  I have the same feeling: I have done it a couple of times and felt very self-conscious but I think my relatives are accepting of the fact that I am an Englishman.  I don’t think I have ever pronamed my own parents.

There were nuances of “respect” that I was completely unaware of, certainly well into my 20s.  One should not drink or smoke in the presence of an elder.  Mukherjee’s cousin asks Blaise to play table tennis just so he can go outside and smoke.  The cousin could not smoke in front of Mukherjee’s father.  To my chagrin I broke this rule; I certainly drank in front of my father and my uncle.  It was only when we were all at a pub in the UK and I was asked what I wanted to drink that I was aware of my faux pas.  I asked for a scotch and a UK uncle retorted: “he (my real uncle) has allowed you to drink?” (My italics).  I didn’t know I needed anyone’s permission to have a drink.

Family names were a complete minefield for me and Blaise did simplify matters.  Names of relatives are generally dependent on whether one is on the paternal or maternal side and by one’s position in the hierarchy by age.  So, one might have a number of names depending on who is referring to you.  As an example Blaise uses Choto Mama, which means mother’s youngest brother.  No wonder I was confused for a while not having grown up in Calcutta or within an extended Bengali family.

Blaise says of “desh”: “the all-important Bengali word that means more than just birthplace....”. I’m not entirely I get the concept of desh, but I know Bengalis ask it of each other.  Is it perhaps to say that we have roots in the country? And it’s asked of people whose families have been in Calcutta for many generations.  But despite being in Calcutta most families keep an ancestral home and land in their desh.

I learnt about caste for the Mukherjees are Brahmins and one of the centrepieces of Days and Nights in Calcutta surrounds an arranged inter-caste marriage.  Blaise is involved as the only younger male relative on the bride’s side.  Some of the issues around arranged marriage are discussed and how a bride might move into her husband’s home to be “broken in” by her mother-in-law.  It’s not as bad as it sounds in an upper caste Bengali home. The choice of the partner is examined: “The margin for error is very narrow....she cannot refuse to marry”. Thankfully this culture has changed in upper caste Calcutta today.  Blaise puts the Western counterpoint: “How can you marry someone you don’t know?”

It was interesting to compare my mother with Mukherjee’s mother, who would refer to her husband as” my husband” and never by his proper name.  I can never recall my parents using their names to refer to or call each other.  In retrospect I do find this quite shocking. “She (Mrs Mukherjee) lives only for Bharati’s visits every three summer...” and for visits from other relatives.  “Family is all”.  Again it’s sobering to realise that some Bengali women have no lives outside the family or the family home.  It must in those circumstances in particular have been a wrench for my mother to leave her own family to come to the UK.  But my mother followed the same pattern in the UK in not having another life despite the educational, work and leisure opportunities that were available.

“The Bengali palate is the least easily appeased in all of India” – there is a considerable focus on food, how it is prepared, how it is eaten.  My parents were perhaps not so food oriented but main meals were eaten late and with a variety of courses.  My mother complained it was far easier to make the children’s Western food.  A speaker at a lecture attended by Blaise in Calcutta remarks that he, a Bengali, returns to Calcutta for the rosha-golas, the very sweet sticky dessert beloved by all Bengalis.

Blaise devotes a considerable part of his chapters in Days and Nights in Calcutta to Bengali culture and in particular Tagore and Satyajit Ray, neither of whom I had explored as a child or even a young adult.  I have seen a few of Tagore filmed works and seen a number of Ray films.  But from my perspective I need to explore further in order perhaps to understand my roots better.

There are a number of references to Bengali positioning within India: “Why are Bengalis hated so, why were they feared by the British (the British capital was moved from Calcutta) and every other conqueror...because of a daunting intelligence, an ability to learn the rules of any conqueror and to overcome them with their own mental sluggishness” (my italics).  You can see why I warm to Blaise.

Mukherjee’s section is well-written and compelling being written by someone a little younger than my mother and also someone who has made the long journey overseas.  I rather think that the English education she received in Calcutta was better than mine in the UK.  She wonders if she should have left Calcutta, Bengalis, her family, to make her life teaching and writing in another language.  I rather think most Bengalis have that longing for Calcutta.

But it is Blaise’s section that has the most resonance for me and there are many facets of the book I have not discussed.  Each time I read Days and Nights in Calcutta, perhaps once a year, I find a new nuance that I had missed.  It is not an exaggeration to say it is a primer of life for me.

Thursday, 27 March 2014

Elephants, Lord Ganesha and the Indian Independence Movement




Ganesh Festival, Bombay 1987

I remember it like it was yesterday.  It was 1987 and we had just arrived in Bombay (as it was then) around 5 weeks into my first sojourn into India.  By this point we were probably a slightly sorry looking and certainly grubby group of 3.  Goodness knows what the staff thought when we decided to ‘splash out’ and have tea in the Taj Mahal Palace Hotel (costing the equivalent of 50p each at the time I recall – which seemed extortionate compared to what we were used to paying).  I definitely felt very out of place among the other guests: women looking immaculate in beautiful shalwar kameez or saris in stark contrast to my very worn jeans and T-shirt.

Unplanned by us, we had arrived just in time for the annual Ganesha festival.  The streets were full of people dancing, throwing red powdered paint everywhere and statues of Ganesha being paraded down towards the beach.  Chowpatty beach was filled with people taking the clay Ganesha statues down to the sea, to float away and dissolve back into the water – symbolically representing the cycle of creation and destruction. So sad to think of that same location – including the Taj Mahal Hotel – in 2008 being the scene of an horrific terrorist attack, killing at least 167 people.





Elephants feature prominently in our household.  My son is mad about elephants - he insisted the website logo had to include an elephant.  Our house has many elephants but one large cuddly elephant called Peanuts (who made his way via Ikea) seems to dominate.  But woe betide anyone who says he is a cuddly and not a real elephant.  For Peanuts (my son loves stories and has a fertile imagination) eats millions of peanuts every day (and only peanuts) and robs banks all round the world to fund his peanut consumption.  He leaves his clone in place in the house while he is away so it looks as though he is still there.  Nothing I say can dissuade him from robbing banks (a criminal activity, very wrong, police will be onto him etc.) – surely the real cause of the world’s economic crisis.  Recently Peanuts pronounced himself King of Elephants – then decided he was not only King, but also the God of elephants, at which point I said I would call him Ganesha since there is only one elephant God.  Such is the rich imaginary world of life with a 12 year old.

Last Saturday we decided to make use of Susen’s British Museum membership and have a look at the Viking exhibition currently on.  The exhibition was busy and we were given timed tickets, with 20 minutes to wait.  After our thali lunch at Masala Zone, it was perfect timing to have a look round the small (free) Ganesha exhibition that was also on.

Rather frustratingly, the exhibition had been sponsored by the Japanese Asahi Shimbun Company (a major national newspaper in Japan), instead of Indian sponsorship – which seemed slightly incongruous.  There were several images of Ganesha including one contemporary picture of Ganesha with a cricket bat - which made me smile, also a shrine to Ganesha and a short video about the manufacture of statues of Ganesha.  To the uninitiated, I have to say it does seem quite bizarre worshipping an elephant God – not to mention a clay statue of an elephant God.  Through my own medium of Buddhism, however, I can relate to it in terms of what that figure is representing.  So a Buddhist might bow down before a rupa or statue of a Buddha, symbolising the aspiration or worship of the ideal of Enlightenment.  In the same way, Ganesha in Hinduism is said to represent wisdom and the remover or creator of obstacles and this is what is worshipped.

The video showing the hand crafting of the statues was fascinating.  First a mould has to be made by covering a statue with latex.  This mould once dry is then filled (by hand it seems) with a mixture of clay and a straw-like material.  When set, the latex mould is removed and the idol is then painted by hand[1].

The exhibition also featured a section on Bal Gangadhar Tilak – also known as  Lokamanya Tilak – an Indian Nationalist Leader.   Born in 1856 in British India, as it was then, he was a journalist, social reformer, lawyer and early prominent leader and activist for Indian Independence.  It was Tilak who started the worship of Ganesha as a public festival – known as Ganesh Chaturthi.  The British had banned Indians holding large gatherings for political purposes, with an exception for religious festivals.  By promoting the worship of Lord Ganesha at a well-organised public event Lokamanya Tilak could bring people together and promote nationalism under the guise of a religious festival – a festival still celebrated long after India gained its independence.

Time then for the Vikings and a whole different story – and one that almost certainly made up some of my ancestry - with family roots in Scotland, North of England and Denmark.  Then a cup of tea and home.





[1] This hand crafting has, apparently, been overtaken in some parts by a more mass production of idols using Plaster of Paris, leading to environment problems.  Heavy metals used in the production were leading to water contamination, together with accumulation on the sea or river bed of non-biodegradable parts of the statue.  The local authorities have been trying to encourage original clay moulds only, or non-destructible statues that are only symbolically immersed in water and then re-used.




Monday, 17 March 2014

The Indian Army in World War 1 – National Army Museum

[caption id="attachment_1200" align="alignleft" width="300"]See bottom of page for photo attribution The Indian Memorial at Neuve Chapelle.
(See end of post for photo attribution)[/caption]

Sometimes it’s very easy to forget that I live in one of the world’s great cities. Some of our activities from movies, to theatre to restaurants have been reviewed on these “pages”. This week I went to two lectures which were outstanding and made me grateful to be a resident of London; firstly, Professor Timothy Snyder gave a lecture at the LSE on the Origins of the Final Solution, and secondly, Professor Sean McMeekin at Pushkin House lectured on Russia in the World War 1 (WW1). Snyder’s lecture is available as a podcast (http://www.lse.ac.uk/IDEAS/events/events/2014/14-03-11-Snyders-.aspx) and I would urge you to watch for his ability to marshal the facts and for the sheer quality of his analysis. McMeekin was good too, but it was his misfortunate that I heard him the day after Snyder. If it was intended that such lectures boost the authors’ marketing and sales efforts then in my case the strategy succeeded for their books are now waiting for me.

WW1 booksPart of the draw for me to McMeekin’s lecture was, of course, that it is the centenary of the beginning of the World War 1, and I have numerous books on the subject waiting to be read.  I’ve begun to re-read Barbara Tuchman’s seminal Guns of August, although it is now rather dated. Nevertheless it is a good beginning. There are many other events on WW1 and I was able to go to The National Army Museum where it was hosting a day on The Armies in 1914. Among the presentations was one on The Indian Army given by Major Gordon Corrigan of The British Commission for Military History.

Corrigan, formerly a major in the Gurkhas, gave a very good overview of the Indian Army particularly in 1914; in addition, he related a number of interesting facts about Indians and their army. At the outbreak of the war in August 1914 the British Army in the UK numbered only about 125,000 men, and about half were required for home defence. By contrast the Germans, French and Russians were able to mobilise millions of men. It would take time for the UK army to be expanded and so one of the key sources was the Indian Army which was all volunteer and regular.

The Indian Army was probably not well prepared for any conflict largely because of budgetary constraints. Its equipment was a little dated but this was easily remedied on their arrival in Europe.  The Indian Army was not typical of the Indian population in that most of its servicemen were from the martial classes, mainly Sikhs, Pathans, Gurkhas and Dogras. Major Corrigan pointedly said that he would rather twenty Sikhs behind him in battle than a hundred Spaniards which is rather unfair on Spaniards but shows the regard in which Sikhs are held by the British.

The martial classes Corrigan continued often lived in areas of India that were mountainous, cold and where there were numerous wars. Thus these classes merely changed their employers. Regiments and companies operated on class lines composed entirely of one religion. Each company at least had their cook and cookhouse where food for each religion could be cooked. Coming to Europe created some potential problems. All religions were prepared to eat chicken, and lamb providing they were butchered according to their customs. Rice grown in the south of France was procured and atta, flour, was brought from India. No groups had any issues in using frozen or tinned meat.

Muslim imams, Hindu and Sikh priests were it seems never sent abroad. Apparently one lost one’s caste if one travelled abroad but caste could be restored on payment of a donation. No Indian religion had any fear of dying; Muslims believed in a glorious death and Hindus that they would be reincarnated. When men died in battle there was always a co-religionist who knew and performed the rituals. Corrigan suggested that Sikhism had largely survived because of the British Indian Army since it recruited only those that followed the essential tenets, and that policy is followed by the Indian Army today. The Sikh cavalry that operated in Europe steadfastly refused to wear helmets; once when forced they put on helmets for senior officers and when out of sight threw them away, and retied their turbans.

Muslims were in particular put under great pressure by the Germans to mutiny or defect. With Turkey fighting on the German side the Germans believed Muslims could be seduced to join their “brothers”. Leaflets in Urdu were printed and fired into Indian Army trenches and positions. These leaflets were however greatly prized to be used as cigarette paper or toilet paper. Translations of letters that were sent home to India reveal there was interest in crops and marriages but no mention of disloyalty.

Generally the Indian Army was officered by men who had graduated in the Top 20-30 of their officer school class, whether Sandhurst or Woolwich for example. It was felt that an officer had to carry greater responsibility in the Indian Army e.g. managing different religions, and learning new languages. There were however many examples of situations where an NCO had to translate the officer’s words after the officer had left beginning: “What Sahib meant.....” Clearly language skills were not always perfect and competency in other subjects often meant that languages skills not tested. In a typical regiment there would be 11 UK officers with a doctor who might be Indian, and the NCOs were Indian. In the course of WW1 it was often difficult to replace officers because of the long time taken to train.

In September 1914 a large contingent of the Indian Army arrived in Marseilles to help relieve some of the pressure on the Allied armies particularly at Ypres, and did not fight as an individual unit but at company level integrated into the British Army. Overall the Indian Army in Europe, while small in numbers, succeeded in its mission, and were gradually replaced as the British Army grew in size. Thereafter the Indians fought in a number of campaigns including with Allenby in Palestine, Gallipoli, Salonika, and Mesopotamia (modern day Iraq), where it was felt their experience of the heat would be valuable forgetting many of the troops came from mountainous regions of India.

Many of the Indians wounded on the European battlefields were evacuated to military hospitals in Brighton and the Chattri Memorial, (see our post here) on the site of funeral pyres, is dedicated to those Indians who died. There is also a memorial to the Indian dead at Neuve Chapelle, France.  In all 43,000 Indians died fighting for the Empire, and 65,000 were wounded. It is a sacrifice that should never be forgotten especially in this anniversary period.

Indian Memorial at Neuve Chapelle photo: Author: Sir Herbert Baker (9 June 1862 – 4 February 1946) and Charles Thomas Wheeler KCVO, PRA (14 March 1892 – 22 August 1974 Carcharoth.  Reproduced under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License

'Speed' at Kali Theatre - a review

Speed‘It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune must be in want of a wife’.

Set in 19th century Britain, this opening sentence of Jane Austen’s ‘Pride and Prejudice’ will be familiar to many, together with Gurinder Chadha’s Indian film adaptation ‘Bride and Prejudice’.

Traditionally though in India it would not be the man or women looking for a spouse, but the parents and relatives.  The ‘ideal type’ for a wife or husband among educated or wealthy Indian families would perhaps include:

  • Doctor (preferably consultant) / PhD / MBA – from the top universities in either UK or US

  • Wealthy or potential to become very wealthy

  • No previous history – ie. has remained celibate / virginal, no boyfriends or girlfriends – not even a hint at fancying the opposite sex until marriage (this rule might be relaxed slightly for boys, never for girls)

  • Heterosexual (of course)

  • Same caste if Hindu

  • Devoted to parents and dutiful.

  • Girls only: good cook, passive and obedient.  Even if a doctor / PhD / MBA

  • Preferably light-skinned (yes, I know – racist overtones – but the preference exists)


This is an ideal type, of course, which only a tiny minority will actually be able to live up to.  Then there is the rest of us and Reality.

For many of us, myself included, your 20s was a time of insecurity and confusion, also excitement and exploration - and trying to work out what on earth you actually want to do with your life.  More so perhaps in a big city like London where anything and everything is on offer. I know there are some – and I have known some very impressive 20-somethings – who are admirably sorted, focused and pursuing their goals.  But I would suggest the vast majority of us, especially in the West, are bumbling along, trying to make sense of it all.  Add to that parental pressure to ‘settle down and get married’ plus your own internal pressure to find a ‘soulmate’ to settle down with and have babies – no big deal then, just someone to sleep with and live with for the rest of your life – and it can add up to much confusion, heartbreak and anxiety.

This is the territory explored by the play Speed, which we saw last week at the Tristan Bates Theatre in Central London.  Written by Iman Qureshi – herself a 20-something, and performed by the innovative Kali Theatre – it focuses on 5 characters brought together at an Asian speed dating event.  Through a series of dialogues between different pairings and monologues, each character reveals their individual search for identity.  There is Qal, the slick city banker who is struggling to acknowledge his attraction to other men.  Sara, in a pink wig and short dress, seems in reaction to, or in denial of her Pakistani Muslim heritage.  Drinking heavily, when asked where she is from she says ‘London’.  And where her parents are from? – ‘London’.  Shalini has just broken up with her white rich boyfriend and Nikesh is marking the first anniversary of his break up from his girlfriend by coming to the speed dating event.  Perhaps most movingly was Sammy – born a girl but changed gender to become a man.  He is here hoping to experience his first kiss with a woman.

Susen’s first response after the play was that ‘it wasn’t very Asian’.  But what exactly is an ‘Asian’ play?  It was a breath of fresh air to have contemporary writing that didn’t evoke the same stereotypes of family pressure to marry the chosen partner versus an ‘immoral’ western lifestyle of boyfriends and girlfriends.  These are the 2nd and 3rd generation immigrants who have been brought up with western liberties and values and it’s good to see a theatre production representing these 20-somethings as individual, sometimes conflicted characters like the rest of us - searching for and trying to create their identities in a reflexive, complex, late modern, liberal, multicultural industrialised society that is London today.

Elephants, Lord Ganesha and the Indian Independence Movement

Ganesh Festival, Bombay 1987 I remember it like it was yesterday.  It was 1987 and we had just arrived in Bombay (as it was the...